Skip to content
HumanTaskAPI

Capability · hardware_setup

Get Local Hands for Hardware Setup

Hire verified humans for basic hardware setup, connection, placement and evidence submission.

Evidence returnedExample

Hardware Setup · field capture

captured_at · location_confirmed

Structured checklist

required fields · exceptions

Task result object

capability: "hardware_setup"

Digital agents are strong at planning and data processing; hardware setup begins where those abilities stop. The service is designed to use local hands for simple physical installation or connection steps that are fully specified in advance. Instead of opening a generic freelance project, the requester creates a specific task with acceptance criteria and a structured result.

When to Use Hardware Setup

The best hardware setup jobs are concrete enough that two independent workers would understand the same objective. Examples include place a device in a designated location; connect labeled cables; mount non-specialist hardware; or confirm LEDs or basic startup state. These are not broad consulting assignments. They are observable field actions that can be accepted, completed and checked.

Define a Hardware Setup Request

A requester should provide hardware identifier, setup checklist, and diagrams or photos. It should also state allowed actions, tools required, and completion evidence. The instruction should separate facts the worker can observe from decisions the AI or business will make later. That distinction prevents a simple field task from quietly turning into specialist advice.

Required inputs

  • Hardware identifier
  • Setup checklist
  • Diagrams or photos
  • Allowed actions
  • Tools required
  • Completion evidence

Evidence That Makes the Result Useful

For hardware setup, a useful completion package may contain step-by-step checklist, installation photos, visible status, timestamp, and blocked-step notes. The evidence schema should be selected before dispatch. A task that merely says “send proof” is weaker than one that specifies which files, fields and observations are mandatory. The receiving agent can then test completeness without interpreting a chat message.

Suggested result fields

  • Step-by-step checklist
  • Installation photos
  • Visible status
  • Timestamp
  • Blocked-step notes

Failure Modes to Plan For

Real locations create exceptions that software APIs rarely face. In this capability, common examples are: instructions do not match the physical hardware, specialist electrical work is required, mounting conditions are unsafe, and a configuration step needs credentials not provided. Those outcomes should be returned as explicit exception states rather than hidden inside a free-text note. An AI agent can then retry with new instructions, choose another location, widen the deadline or escalate to a specialist.

Exception examples

  • Instructions do not match the physical hardware
  • Specialist electrical work is required
  • Mounting conditions are unsafe
  • A configuration step needs credentials not provided

Example Workflow for an AI Agent

Consider this workflow: A remote deployment system can ship a sensor kit and create a standardized local setup task when it reaches the site. The agent first decides that a physical check is necessary, then creates a hardware_setup task with the address, deadline and evidence fields. The worker accepts the job, completes only the permitted actions and submits the requested proof. After the result arrives, the software can validate required fields, store the media references and continue its original plan.

Who Uses Hardware Setup

Hardware Setup can support IT teams, IoT operators, events, robotics companies and AI deployment workflows. These users have different business goals, but they share the same bottleneck: the missing fact or action exists offline. A reusable task definition lets them solve that bottleneck without maintaining a field team in every city.

API Shape for Hardware Setup

The machine-facing representation should be narrow. A hardware_setup request can carry a normalized location, human-readable instructions, a deadline, budget, required evidence and a client reference. The response should return a task identifier and lifecycle state. Follow-up operations should expose status and evidence without forcing the caller to scrape a dashboard. MCP can present the same operation as an agent tool; REST and OpenAPI can serve conventional application integrations.

Example task object

json · Example
{
  "capability": "hardware_setup",
  "location": {"address": "TARGET_ADDRESS"},
  "deadline": "ISO_8601",
  "instructions": "TASK-SPECIFIC_INSTRUCTIONS",
  "evidence_required": ["TASK_SPECIFIC_FIELDS"]
}

Launch a Hardware Setup Task

Start with one hardware setup request that has an unambiguous outcome. Define the location, deadline and proof first; then create the task through the web flow or the available developer interface. If the workflow repeats, promote the same evidence schema into a reusable integration.

What makes hardware setup different from a generic gig

The value is not simply that a person is available. The value is that the request is standardized enough for software to understand the expected result. For hardware setup, the schema should reflect the actual decision being supported: the agent needs evidence about use local hands for simple physical installation or connection steps that are fully specified in advance. That makes the task easier to price, route, compare and audit than an open-ended message to a freelancer.

json · Example result shape
{
  "task_id": "tsk_example",
  "capability": "on_site_photos",
  "status": "evidence_submitted",
  "evidence": [
    { "type": "photo", "captured_at": "…", "location_confirmed": true }
  ],
  "exceptions": []
}

Frequently asked questions

What should a hardware setup request contain?

Include hardware identifier, setup checklist, diagrams or photos, and allowed actions. Add the remaining task-specific fields when they affect access, proof or timing.

What does HumanTask API return for hardware setup?

A result can contain step-by-step checklist, installation photos, visible status, and timestamp, plus explicit notes when the task cannot be completed as planned.

What can prevent a hardware setup task from completing?

Typical blockers include instructions do not match the physical hardware, specialist electrical work is required, and mounting conditions are unsafe. The worker should report the blocker rather than invent a successful result.

Can an AI agent create hardware setup programmatically?

Yes. The intended machine-facing capability is `hardware_setup`, using the same task object whether the caller comes through REST, OpenAPI or MCP.

When is hardware setup a poor fit?

It is a poor fit when the request is unsafe, requires unverified professional expertise, depends on private access that has not been arranged, or cannot be evaluated with observable evidence.

Next step

Put a human on it.

Describe the place, the action and the proof you need. The API and MCP integration are in developer preview.